Why do we
need a Master Plan?
It is a state
requirement upon which our Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Regulations,
Site Plan Regulations, Capital Improvements Plan, and other related
regulations depend.
What is the
Master Plan?
As defined by the
state:
“The purpose of
the master plan is to set down as clearly and practically as possible
the best and most appropriate future development of the [town], to aid
the [planning] board in designing ordinances that result in preserving
and enhancing the unique quality of life and culture of New Hampshire,
and to guide the board in the performance of its other duties in a
manner that achieves the principles of smart growth, sound planning, and
wise resource protection.”
Don’t we
already have a Master Plan?
Yes. Work started
on it in 1993 and chapter drafts were finished in 1998, culminating in
its approval in 2000.
Why should we
update the Master Plan?
Our high growth
rate is challenging our prior thoughts and approaches to community
planning. We need to work quickly, so that we maximize the opportunities
for implementing any changes that this update may bring to light. The
longer it takes to complete our next update, the more our town is built
out, guided by the current Master Plan. Many events have either come
into play recently, or become more pressing since the last update: Route
111 reconstruction; realignment of I-93 and Exit 3; school concerns
(high school, elementary school, kindergarten); recreational facilities
(indoors, outdoors, passive, active); conservation land purchases;
community road connections; economic development; zoning.
What does the
town do with the Master Plan?
The Board of
Selectmen uses the Master Plan in legislative and policy-related
decisions they encounter: upgrading of roads; approval of conservation
land purchases; town-wide policy decisions.
The Planning Board
uses the Master Plan to guide them in judicial site plan review: assure
that an application is consistent with the town’s goals. The Planning
Board also uses the Master Plan in a legislative capacity: proposing
amendments to the Zoning Map and the Zoning Ordinance.
How did we
determine that dollar amount?
The Planning Board
solicited bids for the update process, interviewed the responding firms,
and selected Taintor & Associates. Their bid is for $89,705, the amount
requested.
What town
support is there for the update?
The update is in
the Capital Improvements Program (CIP); the town’s financial planning
tool for capital and expenditures of $50,000 or more. This program has
enabled the town to allocate funds wisely and only as needed, while
maintaining as stable a tax rate as possible.
The Planning Board
has initiated this request and supported it all through the approval
process.
The Board of
Selectmen has recommended Town Warrant #17, which seeks funding for the
update.
What will be
different with this Master Plan?
There will be more
citizens input and a new section on ‘Economic Development’ that will
assist us in working the difficult issue of balancing commercial,
residential, and open land use. What are our economic strengths,
weaknesses, and goals?
Perhaps one of the
most important sections will be the ‘Implementation’ section, to ensure
that we have a roadmap for implementing the directed changes, as brought
out through the citizen input and subcommittees. The intent of this
section is a long-range action program of specific actions, time frames,
allocation of responsibility for actions, description of land
development regulations to be adopted, and procedures, which the town
may use to monitor and measure the effectiveness of each section of the
plan. (text from the state)
Why not do it
ourselves?
Why should an
outside firm facilitate the process?
As done by the
community alone, the update will take years to complete: Master Plan
2000 was started in 1993; Master Plan 1985 was started in 1980. People
come and go, and the long duration can mean that it becomes hard to
complete the writing of the document in a cohesive fashion, based on the
latest applicable data. In light of the growth we are experiencing, the
quicker we complete the process, the greater the opportunities for
putting the finished Master Plan into action.
Also, done solely
under the auspices of the Planning Board, the board will have precious
little time to devote towards updating any sections of the Zoning
Ordinance that may warrant attention.
What kind of
citizen input will there be?
Taintor &
Associates has demonstrated excellence in tapping into the community to
maximize the breadth and depth of citizen input. It was one of the major
reasons why the Planning Board selected them, and we look forward to a
solid community outreach, and subsequent input and involvement.
When/How can
I get involved and have my voice heard?
The immediate show
of support for the process is to vote “YES” on Article #17 (Master Plan
update) at the polls on Tuesday, March 9th (7am-8pm at Golden
Brook School). This allows us to move forward with the process. The next
opportunity will be to step forward and become involved with the
community-wide input sessions that Taintor & Associates will host.
Who has
oversight of the update?
It is the Planning
Board’s statutory duty to oversee the updating of the Master Plan.
What would be
the next step in the process, if the warrant article passes?
The
Planning Board will formally establish the subcommittee structure after
the vote. We hope to have a sufficient number of active citizens willing
to be involved with the various subcommittees.