|
HISTORIC DISTRICT/HERITAGE COMMISSION
T. Furlong made a motion to accept the June minutes. C. Pynn seconded the motion. The June minutes were accepted by unanimous vote. P. Schena reviewed for the Commission the course of a recent meeting and communication with the NH Department of Transportation regarding the proposed I 93 project and its impact of historic properties in Windham. In this context he distributed the state's currently proposed plan, as well as documents developed and provided by the state on historic mitigation required as a result of the proposed project. These include the two former Armstrong houses and barn that constitute the current Common Man site, the Dinsmore (stone) house on Rt. 111, and Indian Rock. He noted a willingness on the part of DOT representatives to discuss historic mitigation matters constructively. He further noted the DOT's timetable to finalize its plan by the end of August, 2002 and the time-sensitive requirement to formulate comments and recommendations to the DOT. All members of the Commission expressed their continuing concern with the time-sensitive need to formulate a unified, coherent response to the state's plan. P. Schena was asked to contact the town's Board of Selectmen to request a meeting to discuss how the Commission might proceed on this matter jointly with the Board and other town boards and commissions. P. Schena reported on the Commission workshop meeting with the Planning Board held on June 26. The meeting was scheduled to discuss the Commission's concerns about the use of synthetic materials in historic districts. P. Schena explained the Planning Board's request that the Commission revise the Historic District Ordinance to reflect all proposed changes and submit a draft to the Board for review by mid-July. Based on materials discussed at the meeting, P. Schena prepared a draft revised Ordinance. He explained the specific changes contained in the draft, distributed it for review by the Commission's members, and requested that comments on the revised document be returned to him promptly in order to comply with the Board's request as to timing. At its June 13, 2002 meeting, the Commission agreed to study the establishment of a historic marker program in Windham. P. Schena reported on his investigation into this matter. He explained that materials forwarded by the state suggested that a plan to formerly mark historic asset to be successful should include: 1) clear program objectives, 2) a governing or project review body, 3) clear requirements and approval criteria, 4) marker design and cost parameters, and 5) funding sources for the program. C. Pynn suggested the Commission continue to study the establishment of a formal marker program. She further suggested the Commission review the prior experience of the town in marking historic assets. The Commission agreed to return this matter to its agenda in future meetings. In response to an inquiry from Mr. Brian Harvey regarding recommendations for road names in the Spruce Pond area, the Commission proposed the following names: The Commission strongly suggested against the use of Clydesdale.
Copyright © 2002 All Rights Reserved |
||
|